Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Biden administration

by

immigration-8579109_1280The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently announced some important updates for green card applicants, and those renewing existing employment authorization documents also known as EADs.

I-485 New Green Card Application Form

On December 10, 2024, USCIS published a new edition of Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Resident or Adjust Status. The new form includes updated questions and important instructions for green card applicants.

Beginning February 10, 2025, USCIS will only accept the 10/24/24 edition of Form I-485. The agency will reject any older editions submitted on or after that date.

The new edition of Form I-485 features the following major changes:

  • Requires applicants who need to submit a Form I-693, Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record, or a partial Form I-693 (such as a vaccination record), to submit the Form I-693 or partial Form I-693 with their Form I-485.  If the applicant does not submit the Form I-693 with Form I-485 when it is required, the Form I-485 may be rejected
  • Enables applicants who are exempt from the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the INA, requirement to request the exemption on Form I-485 rather than submitting a separate Form I-864W, Request for Exemption for Intending Immigrant’s Affidavit of Support. Form I-864W has been discontinued.
  • Contains clarifications for questions about the public charge ground of inadmissibility. The questions will now require an applicant to identify their immigrant category so that USCIS can determine whether or not they are exempt from this ground of inadmissibility and adjudicate the application accordingly
  • Streamlines the collection of information and clarifies instructions and applicant requirements.

Continue reading

by

recruitment-6838250_1280New changes are being implemented for certain self-petitioners filing immigration petitions under the Violence Against Women Act, also known as VAWA.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that beginning in December they will be conducting in-person interviews for select VAWA self-petitioners who have an I-360 and I-485 application pending.

Not all self-petitioners will be required to attend an interview. Self-petitioners who have filed a stand-alone I-360 will not be interviewed.

USCIS expects to continue to adjudicate the majority of VAWA cases without the need for an interview.

Why has this change been made?

An increase in the volume of immigration petitions filed under the VAWA program, along with a surge in VAWA-related fraud reported in the states of New York, Massachusetts, and Maryland has led to this policy change.

While no plans are currently being made to expand interviews to a broader pool of VAWA self-petitioners, the incoming Trump administration may consider this in the future.

How will I know if I am required to attend an in-person interview?

VAWA self-petitioners who are required to attend an interview, will receive an interview notice by mail at the safe address they have provided. Legal representatives will also be notified by mail.

Please note that a self-petitioner’s selection for an interview is not a negative indicator and does not suggest a case will receive an unfavorable outcome.

Continue reading

by

doctor-5569298_1280Wondering what’s new in immigration? We have some bad news for adjustment of status applicants filing a green card inside the United States.

Effective immediately, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will now require adjustment of status applicants filing Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status to submit their application along with the sealed medical examination from their civil surgeon also known as Form I-693, Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record.

Applicants who fail to provide the medical examination may have their I-485 green card application rejected by USCIS.

Why is a Medical Examination Required for a Green Card?

Those who are applying for adjustment of status (a green card) are generally required to undergo an immigration medical examination. During the examination, the civil surgeon will review the applicant’s vaccination history to determine whether the applicant has received all required vaccinations, including the COVID-19 vaccination.

Once the medical examination has been completed, the civil surgeon must sign and provide a sealed Form I-693 report that must be mailed by the applicant along with the I-485 application.

The medical report is necessary to prove that green card applicants are free from health conditions that would render them inadmissible to the U.S. on health-related grounds.

Accordingly, filing the Form I-693 and Form I-485 together is now a requirement.

Continue reading

by

animal-2345418_1280

We are pleased to report that today the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs published the December Visa Bulletin. Unfortunately, the December Visa Bulletin brings almost no movement.

USCIS Adjustment of Status

For employment-based and family-sponsored preference categories, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has confirmed it will continue to use the Dates for Filing chart to determine filing eligibility for adjustment of status to permanent residence in the month of December.

Highlights of the December 2024 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of December?

Employment-Based Categories

  • The Final Action Date for India EB-2 will advance by two weeks to August 1, 2012
  • The Final Action Date for India EB-3 will advance by one week to November 8, 2012
  • All other employment-based Final Action Dates and Dates for Filing will remain the same in December as the previous month

Family-Sponsored Categories

  • All family-sponsored Final Action Dates and Dates for Filing will remain the same in December as the previous month

For more details, please see our analysis of the December 2024 Visa bulletin below.

Employment-Based Categories

FINAL ACTION DATES FOR EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCE CASES

According to the Department of State’s December 2024 Visa Bulletin, the following Final Action cutoff dates will apply for employment-based categories in the month of December.

  • No change from previous month, except for EB-2 India and EB-3 India

EB-1 Aliens of extraordinary ability, Outstanding Professors and Researchers, and Certain Multinational Managers or Executives

  • EB-1 India will remain at February 1, 2022
  • EB-1 China will remain at November 8, 2022
  • EB-1 All other countries will remain current

EB-2 Members of the Professions and Aliens of Exceptional Ability

  • EB-2 India will advance by two weeks to August 1, 2012
  • EB-2 China will remain at March 22, 2020
  • EB-2 All other countries will remain at March 15, 2023

EB-3 Professionals and Skilled Workers

  • EB-3 India will advance by one week to November 8, 2012
  • EB-3 China will remain at April 1, 2020
  • EB-3 All other countries will remain at November 15, 2022

EB-3 Other Workers

Continue reading

by

boy-2027487_1280In the last few days, the immigration world has been reeling from the results of the Presidential election. People across the nation are preparing for an incoming Trump administration that promises to be extremely tough on immigration.

While the future of many hangs in the balance, the federal courts have started taking action to undo the immigration policies of the Biden administration.

Just two days after Americans cast their ballots and elected Donald Trump to become the next President of the United States, federal Judge J. Campbell Barker of the Eastern District Court of Texas issued a court order in the case Texas et. al. vs. DHS et. al., Case No. 6:24-cv-00306 (E.D. Tex.), ending President Biden’s Keeping Families Together parole program.

In a short one-page ruling, the judge declared that the Biden administration lacked the authority to grant parole in place to undocumented aliens, and therefore set aside and vacated Biden’s Keeping Families Together program.

In doing so, judge Barker delivered the first major blow to Biden’s immigration friendly policies. This decision stops the government from accepting applications for parole in place under the program, which would have allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. Citizens to remain together during the immigration process.

Continue reading

by

border-6971270_1280Today, October 17, 2024, the U.S. government announced new measures providing immigration relief to Lebanese nationals currently residing inside the United States.

18-Month Designation of TPS for Lebanon

Firstly, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced the designation of Lebanon for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for a period of 18 months. This decision marks Lebanon’s first designation for TPS.

This designation was made based on ongoing armed conflict and extraordinary and temporary conditions in Lebanon that prevent its nationals from safely returning to their country.

A notice will soon be published in the Federal Register confirming the Secretary of Homeland Security’s designation of Lebanon including more details regarding the designation. Lebanese nationals who are approved for TPS can lawfully remain in the United States while the security situation improves. Those who are eligible can apply for temporary employment authorization by filing Form I-765 Application for Employment Authorization at the same time of filing Form I-821, Application for Temporary Protected Status.

What We Know

To be eligible for TPS under the Lebanon’s designation, Lebanese nationals (and individuals having no nationality who last habitually resided in Lebanon) must demonstrate continuous residence in the United States since October 16, 2024.  Those who attempt to enter the United States after October 16, 2024, are ineligible for TPS. Lebanese nationals currently not residing in the United States are also ineligible to receive benefits.

The program’s effective date has not yet been announced but is expected to be published in the Federal Register in the coming weeks including the application instructions.

As a reminder, TPS applicants must meet all eligibility requirements and undergo security and background checks to gain approval.

Continue reading

by

megaphone-6587769_1280In a shocking turn of events, the Biden administration recently announced that it will not be renewing humanitarian parole protections for nationals of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. The CHNV parole program was first launched in October of 2022 to discourage illegal border crossings.

It previously allowed qualifying nationals and their immediate members to apply for advanced travel authorization and granted them a temporary period of parole of up to two years for urgent humanitarian reasons.

Individuals were required to have a U.S. based sponsor and pass security checks as part of the application process. Once paroled into the United States, applicants were eligible to apply for an employment authorization document (EAD) with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

Now the humanitarian parole program is no more. The government has said that those who came to the United States using the parole policy, will need to obtain legal status through other means before their parole period terminates to remain in the United States. Those who have no lawful basis to remain in the country beyond the parole period will be required to depart or risk being placed in removal proceedings.

According to government data, approximately 538,000 migrants have used the program to travel to the United States (214,000 Haitians, 117,000 Venezuelans, 111,000 Cubans, and 96,000 Nicaraguans).

The first group of nationals who will begin losing their parole status are Venezuelans who arrived in the U.S. through the CHNV program in October 2022. The parole periods of Cubans, Haitians, and Nicaraguans are set to begin expiring early next year.

Continue reading

by

ai-generated-8489042_1280New details have emerged relating to a pending lawsuit before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas known as  Texas et. al. vs. DHS et. al., Case No. 6:24-cv-00306 (E.D. Tex.), which is currently blocking the approval of applications filed under the Biden administration’s parole in place program.

Litigation Updates

On August 26th eleven individual intervening parties who stood to benefit from the parole in place program filed a motion to intervene in the Texas lawsuit.

Thereafter, on September 3rd the Texas district court judge denied the motion to intervene. As a result, the intervening parties filed an appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit claiming the lower court’s denial of the motion to intervene was unjustified.

On September 11th  the Fifth Circuit Court ordered the lower court to freeze all proceedings until they have had the opportunity to hear the intervenors appeal.

A hearing date of October 10th has been set and the court has said that no further action can be taken in the lower court until that date.

The appellate court’s order states as follows, “Meaning no criticism of the district court’s recognition of the need for prompt resolution, this panel must have an opportunity to consider the merits briefs, scheduled to be received by September 16, and to hear argument on the appeal of the denial of intervention. Accordingly, we administratively STAY proceedings in the district court pending a decision on the merits or other order of this court. The stay issued by the district court will remain in effect pending further order of this court.”

What does this mean for parole in place applications?

In the meantime, USCIS can continue accepting and processing parole in place applications under the Keeping Families Together program, but it cannot approve cases until further notice.

Continue reading

by

judgment-8442199_1280We have new developments to report relating to pending litigation for parole in place applications in the case Texas et. al. vs. DHS et. al., Case No. 6:24-cv-00306 (E.D. Tex.).

Yesterday evening, federal Judge J. Campbell Barker of the Eastern District Court of Texas issued a court order extending his previous administrative stay on parole in place (PIP) approvals for an additional 14-day period expiring on September 23, 2024.

The judge’s initial stay (of August 26th), which was set to expire on September 9, 2024, will now continue through September 23rd.

What does this mean for parole in place applications?

While the administrative stay is in place, those eligible for parole in place under the Keeping Families Together program can continue to submit the online Form I-131F, Application for Parole in Place for Certain Noncitizen Spouses and Stepchildren of U.S. Citizens with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

USCIS will also continue to issue biometrics appointment notices to capture applicant biometrics during the administrative stay.

However, USCIS is prohibited from approving applications received for as long as the administrative stay is in place (currently until September 23rd)

This is because the Texas lawsuit challenges the legality of the Keeping Families Together program and approvals must be paused while the parties in the case make their arguments before the court, and a final ruling is made.

What’s next in the Texas lawsuit?

The court has ordered an accelerated hearing where motions for preliminary and permanent relief will be heard on September 18th.  The accelerated proceedings in this case mean that the judge could make a decision on the merits of the case in the coming months. However, despite the outcome in this case appeals are likely to be filed in district court.

Can the judge extend the administrative stay past September 23rd?

Yes. The judge may decide to extend the administrative stay past September 23rd in the future if it finds that good cause exists to do so throughout the litigation process.

Continue reading

by

hands-7107606_1280-2

Parole in Place – Keeping Families Together Updates

As previously reported, a federal judge in Texas has temporarily blocked the Biden administration from approving parole requests under the Keeping Families Together program.

What does this mean for parole in place applications?

Due to a 14-day administrative stay handed down by District Court Judge J. Campbell Barker on August 26, 2024, in the case, Texas v. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) cannot approve parole in place applications filed under the Keeping Families Together program.

The order may be extended by the judge at the conclusion of the 14-day period.

USCIS has stated on its webpage that during the district court’s administrative stay, USCIS will:

USCIS also reminds the public that the administrative stay does not affect any parole in place applications that were approved before the court’s administrative stay order was issued at 6:46 p.m. Eastern Time on August. 26, 2024.

Those who are eligible must consult with an immigration attorney as soon as possible to determine whether to proceed with applying for parole in place while applications are still being accepted by USCIS.

For more information about this lawsuit, please click here.

EB-1 Visa Updates

Recently, the State Department confirmed that all numbers in the EB-1 preference category have been utilized for fiscal year 2024 and that no further EB-1 visas/green cards will be issued for the remainder of this fiscal year which ends on September 30, 2024.

It is also foreseeable that the EB-2 and EB-4 categories will become unavailable in the near future.

Continue reading