Visa Lawyer Blog

by

markus-spiske-RX-BevgxSXs-unsplash-scaledIn a policy memorandum released today, just ahead of the Memorial Day holiday, the Trump administration announced that temporary visa holders seeking green cards should leave the United States and complete their immigration process through consular processing in their home countries.

But is adjustment of status completely off the table? No. While the government has made clear that individuals intending to immigrate to the United States are generally expected to pursue immigrant visas abroad, adjustment of status remains a discretionary pathway to a green card.

When deciding whether to exercise discretion to grant adjustment of status in the United States, USCIS officers will apply a “totality of the circumstances” analysis, weighing both favorable and unfavorable factors before reaching a decision.

Overview

For decades, Adjustment of Status has been one of the most reliable pathways to apply for a green card for immigrants already living in the U.S., who entered the country lawfully. This process has involved filing the I-485, remaining in the country while the green card case is pending, waiting for an interview, and receiving a final approval.

The ability to apply for adjustment of status has not been taken away with today’s announcement, however, the sense of security that applicants once had has been blurred.

The Policy Memorandum

In its policy memorandum, the government stressed that individuals admitted to the United States on temporary visas (tourist, student, work visas, etc.) are generally expected to leave the country rather than pursue Adjustment of Status from inside the U.S.

Instead, those wishing to remain in the U.S. permanently are expected to apply for an immigrant visa from abroad. But today’s announcement does not prevent those who qualify from seeking adjustment of status, although applicants should exercise greater caution and understand that certain factors may negatively affect their chances of approval.

Continue reading

by

vilkasss-ai-generated-8894582-scaledU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is reportedly increasing scrutiny of EB-5 immigrant investor applications filed by individuals with ties to certain Chinese technology companies and institutions.

Recent cases suggest that adjudicators are looking beyond traditional EB-5 requirements—such as lawful source of funds and job creation—and are instead placing greater emphasis on national security concerns, including potential connections to Chinese companies involved in telecommunications, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and data infrastructure.

Applicants who have worked for or are affiliated with major firms and universities associated with China’s tech ecosystem may face additional background checks and requests for detailed disclosures about their employment history, organizational roles, and any perceived government or military links.

Continue reading

by

elin-melaas-rAfpEO53684-unsplash-scaledWe are pleased to report that the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has published the June 2026 Visa Bulletin.

In this blog post, we breakdown the movement of the employment-based and family-sponsored categories in the coming month.

Adjustment of Status Chart

For adjustment of status filings to permanent residence in the month of June, USCIS will continue using the Dates for Filing Chart for family-sponsored categories only.

For employment-based categories, USCIS will also continue using the Final Action Dates Chart.

   Highlights of the June 2026 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of June?

Employment-Based Categories

Final Action Advancements

EB-1 Aliens of extraordinary ability, Outstanding Professors and Researchers, and Certain Multinational Managers or Executives

  • EB-1 India will retrogress 3.5 months to December 15, 2022
  • Except China, all other countries remain current

EB-2 Members of the Professions and Aliens of Exceptional Ability

  • EB-2 India will retrogress 10.4 months to September 1, 2013
  • Except China, all other countries remain current

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-graduation-7077409_1280
The White House is reviewing a proposed federal rule (RIN: 1653-AA95) that could change how international students maintain legal status in the United States. The proposal, submitted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), would replace the long-standing “duration of status” framework with fixed-term limits for student visas.

If finalized, the rule would affect students on F-1 visas, as well as some exchange visitors and foreign media. Under the current system, international students can remain in the U.S. for as long as they are enrolled full-time and comply with visa requirements.

The proposed change would instead impose a four-year stay limit before students would need to apply for a renewal of their status.

Continue reading

by

fernandozhiminaicela-stethoscope-4280497-scaled

The Trump administration has quietly reversed a policy that threatened the jobs and immigration status of thousands of foreign doctors working in the United States.

Doctors from countries impacted by the administration’s expanded travel ban will once again be allowed to continue processing visa applications, work permits, and green card cases.

Earlier this year, the Department of Homeland Security implemented a freeze on immigration benefits for nationals from 39 countries. The policy placed many foreign physicians in legal limbo, forcing some hospitals to place doctors on administrative leave while others faced the possibility of losing their ability to work entirely.

The administration has now confirmed that applications associated with medical physicians will continue processing, exempting doctors from the immigration freeze. The change was made quietly, without a formal public announcement.

The update appeared on the USCIS webpage outlining its enhanced screening and vetting procedures which now indicates doctors are no longer subject to adjudicative processing holds:

“Internal Review Process

USCIS established an internal process for lifting holds on individual or group cases, requiring comprehensive review by multiple offices. Holds have been lifted for aliens vetted through Operation PARRIS, certain petitions filed by U.S. citizens, intercountry adoption forms, certain rescheduled oath ceremonies, statutory and regulatory decision issuance, refugee registrations for South African citizens/nationals, certain special immigrant visa petitions, certain employment authorization documents, and asylum applications from non high-risk countries, and applications associated with medical physicians….”

Continue reading

by

d4rkwzd-recruitment-6838250_1280The Trump administration has introduced a new visa screening policy at consulate interviews that could make it harder for people with potential asylum claims to enter the United States.

According to the Washington Post, consular officers are now directed to ask nonimmigrant visa applicants whether they have been persecuted in their home country, or fear harm if they return.

That question may sound harmless, but the consequences are significant. If an applicant says they have suffered harm/mistreatment in their country, or fear harm/mistreatment in returning home, their visa could be denied. If they say they do not fear returning to their home country and later apply for asylum in the United States, the government may use that earlier answer against them. This creates a serious dilemma for people who may genuinely need protection in the future.

The policy appears designed to screen potential asylum claims before an applicant ever reaches U.S. soil. Under U.S. asylum law, a person generally must be physically present in the United States or arrive at a U.S. border to request asylum. By using the visa process to flag and deny applicants who may later seek protection, the government could stop some individuals from ever getting the chance to present their asylum claims.

This change could especially affect people from countries facing political violence, religious persecution, war, government abuse, or targeted discrimination. Students, tourists, workers, and business visitors may all face difficult questions if they have legitimate reasons to travel to the U.S. on temporary visas but also fear returning home.

Continue reading

by

noupload-fingerprint-2108872

USCIS is expected to pause or delay adjudication of certain immigration benefit requests that require fingerprint-based background checks following the agency’s implementation of a new enhanced FBI security vetting process.

The new process became effective on April 27, 2026.

According to reports, USCIS officers have been directed to submit pending applications for enhanced FBI background checks and to withhold final adjudication until the required security clearances are completed.

The initial group of impacted cases is expected to include applications for which fingerprints were already collected and submitted before April 27, 2026.

At a Glance

Applications requiring fingerprint-based background checks may be subject to an adjudication pause for enhanced security checks, based on new USCIS internal guidance

Affected case types are expected to include adjustment of status, asylum, naturalization, family-based green card sponsorship petitions, and other immigration benefit requests requiring biometrics (fingerprints).

For pending cases where fingerprints were submitted before April 27, USCIS officers are expected to re-submit the fingerprints already on file through the new FBI system. Applicants generally should not be required to take further action unless specifically instructed by USCIS.

Newly filed cases received after April 27 may also be placed in a processing queue while USCIS works through the backlog of pending cases requiring re-vetting. At this time, one reported exception appears to be U.S. citizenship applications where oath ceremonies have already been scheduled.

Continue reading

by

joseph-chan-Q-730ajUcQ-unsplash-1-scaledFor years, DACA gave hundreds of thousands of young immigrants a fragile kind of security: permission to work, build lives, and avoid deportation — at least temporarily.

That security just got weaker.

On April 24, 2026, the Justice Department’s Board of Immigration Appeals issued a new precedent decision saying that DACA status alone is not enough to end deportation proceedings. The case involved Catalina “Xóchitl” Santiago, a DACA recipient whose removal case had been terminated by an immigration judge because her DACA protection was still active. DHS appealed — and won.

Continue reading

by

publicdomainpictures-passport-315266_1920According to a recent New York Times article, the Justice Department is reportedly preparing to expand efforts to strip citizenship from naturalized Americans, identifying 384 people whose citizenship it may try to revoke.

These cases may be assigned to prosecutors across 39 U.S. attorney’s offices, which could mean a sharp increase in denaturalization cases.

What’s Denaturalization?

Continue reading

by

16041499-capital-5043172_1280

On Thursday last week, the U.S. House of Representatives advanced a bill that would extend protections for hundreds of thousands of Haitian immigrants currently living in the United States under Temporary Protected Status (TPS).

The proposal would allow eligible Haitians to remain in the country and continue working legally for an additional period due to ongoing instability and humanitarian challenges in Haiti.

The move comes amid strong political disagreement, with supporters arguing that Haitian immigrants contribute significantly to essential industries such as healthcare and caregiving, and that returning them to unsafe conditions would be both harmful and impractical.

Continue reading